I was browsing my memory stick and I found this piece of writing and it inspired me to share a smigit of info. It also ties in nicely with my ISU. :D

In catholic schools you not only learn exactly what the public school kids learn, you also learn this:


April 20th 2008

Our Calling

She walks down the street
Padding along her small feet
When she gets to her destination
The clamps go on her feet
Her fingers twiddles with the yarn in defeat
He missed a stitch and his eyes are wide with fear
His muscles are sore
As if he hasn’t moved for years
It's already dark and he hasn’t moved since morning
The Master's footsteps are heard
Stiff as a stone he awaits his punishment
He won’t make it home

Jesus Christ put them on this earth
But why would he choose them
To have no choice
Everyone has a calling
But this is not theirs

These are all of god's children
Why aren’t we all treated the same?
Because our parents just bought her rug
And we’ve just received a few of his shirts

They are faceless
They have no hope
Who will help them?
As voiceless as they are
They're screaming out loud
Sacred and alone
Nobody knows
Who'll help them?
They are just teens that don't know



Compassion, and understanding what happens around the world. We have to get the word out that there is something wrong in socoiety and we have to fix it.


Oh, and something the public schools do not learn very well, the Art of BS. And that is why I am thankful for region class, even though I don;t believe in god. The message I love (and hope gets pulled across into some heads), but the assignment was to show God's presence and actions in the world today.

Life skills you know?

:)

Does it ever occur to anyone that mental health issues might be genetic? What is wrong with the world today?
Well, clearly, many monstrous things.
I could just picture that old fart with his helpless granddaughter.
"Hey grandpa, why--"
"Why the hell won;t you shut up!?"
And a few bashes to the head later, there is poor little Rosie, dead as a dried flower.

I do not understand why adults seem to deem it okay to hit a child purely because they are annoying. I am all for hitting a child for discipline (I'm brown, what can I say? When my kids are being bad, my last resort is a smack on the bum, regardless of government) but this takes it too far. I do not understand why people think they have the power to shut someone up, never the less a toddler, by brutally bashing them into a pulp and then leaving them for dead.

What I couldn't stand in this article, was how the bastard stuck Rose in a suitcase because he was scared. Some one should have beaten his useless excess of a human being to death and thrown him carelessly into a river.


This angers me too much to write an actual response that is being graded.

"TheStar.com | Columnist | Child's abuse, death grip Israel." TheStar.com Toronto Edition - Breaking News, Sports, Entertainment, Business, Classifieds, Local and National News - GTA, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 19 July 2009 [http://www.thestar.com/article/486838].

I laughed a little bit at the idiocy of the mother of Danielle. She loved her baby alright, so much that she never wanted her to grow up.

This woman is an idiot, and she angers me a bit. Whats more is that she thinks she didn't do anything wrong. Can you say therapy? I mean this woman is practically screaming for it.

I hate people who can not see the wrong doing that they've done. If it is to their own selves, I honestly do not care, but when they screw around with other people then I've got issues. Where was Danielle's father? Was he aware of how she had be treated when she was with her mother? Does he care at all for her? No, I don't think so.

I think the mother has problems defining the term 'love' and what it means. Its not that difficult to grasp really. Its when you have strong feelings towards someone and you will do what ever you can to make said person happy, or do what ever is right for them, even if it hurts you. She clearly was not aware of this. The article stated that Danielle smiled for the first time in a long time, what does that say about the mother? Why didn't the mother let her grow as person if she loved her so much? The mother is messed up.

I feel so bad for Danielle, because she can not talk, and she wasn't found earlier. This means that they can't undo much of what she's already learned. Re-teaching her basic life skills will be extremely difficult and the fact that no one might take her in, never the less keep her brakes my heart because what these kids need is a person who is there for them more than anything. And that is something social rehabilitation centers and social workers just can't provide unless there is adoption papers in tow, which is sadly unlikely.

;(


"Mother of feral girl: 'I love that baby, she's my life' - Bay News 9." Baynews9.com. 15 July 2009 [http://www.baynews9.com/content/36/2008/8/3/370562.html].

Bark, bark, who's a good girl?

Why do psycho maniac have children? I mean do they want to experiment on them? Why do they bother to care?

I find it so interesting, parents who neglect their children and have them live in a small room with their animals.
It doesn't shock me as much when I read that they took the dogs for actual walks. Goes to show how much they actually cared for their daughter seeing as they thought the dogs should at least get a brake from her.
I wonder what that might have felt like, having the only people who cared for you disappear for about half an hour every day and every night. That poor girl was probably traumatized when they left.

I am really happy however, that Natasha (said neglected child) is in proper care now. It is good that they found her whilst she was still very young. I'm glad that she will be able to be rehabilitated and become a person, and not a dog. She gets the winning lottery ticket and has a chance to become a mobile thinking human and gets to have experience human experiences, more importantly humane experiences.

;)


"First picture of five-year-old 'Mowgli' girl Natasha Mikhailova who barks like a dog after parents neglected her | Mail Online." Home | Mail Online. 15 July 2009 [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1188976/First-picture-year-old-Mowgli-girl-Natasha-Mikhailova-barks-like-dog-parents-neglected-her.html].

So prolonging having children later does have its down sides. It seems that the larger age gaps between mother and teens are oh so slightly close in quarters when it comes down to the, 'stages of life'.

When menopause and puberty collide. Oh what a war. When moms go through menopause they are not as stable as they used to be. Just like teens their hormones are all over the place and in turn not too good for controlling your kids.

This is a real issue for the child/teen at hand. Whats worse is that because of women prolonging having children, this will soon become the 'norm'. First divorce and now hormones, what else can we throw to the future generation?

The mom might add to the added stress of a hormonal high and in turn the teen can push 'the button' and set off their mothers. It is not ideal, both the mom and her kids are effected by this, and now what if the Mom doesn't just have teens? What if there are younger children in the picture as well. The younger child gets a nice earful of the shouting, arguing and constant complaining. The hormonal environment is not the kindest and most ideal in which to be raising a young child. Said child looks up to tier parents and siblings and if they are battling it out with each other, where doe that leave the child? What do you think the mimic, or take form those reoccurring events?

In the book, Maximum Ride: The Angel Experiment, by James Patterson, the youngest of the group, 'The Gas Man', lovingly called 'Gazzy' imitates the role of the two older boys Fang and Iggy. Fang is quiet and distant, whilst Iggy, being blind is sometimes quite frustrated. Fang and Iggy, both being fourteen, and age that usually comes with a new found friend named, 'hormones'. The main character, Max who is also fourteen also has her plate full beause they are contstanly in some kind of danger and whats worse is that she has to put up with her hormones on top of that. Her hormones sometimes influence her decision making in the book.

The thing is that none of the oldest kids (primarly Max and Fang) do not have a role model. They don't have anyone guiding them through these stages and so their experinces are unxpeected to them because most of the time they are unaware of what is happening to them and the changes that are occouring. In repsonse the younger members of the group follow in suite as seen Nugde, who is eleven and is just startying to embark on this. Her role model would be Max, which is alot to handle.

Max acts like a mother to the group or 'Flock' as they like to call eachother. Macx and the mothers going throuh menapause are kind of one and the same because they have to expeinrce life changing events in front of the people they need to conrtol them selves the most for. They are setting the example as they experience it, which I think can be pretty damaging to the development to the kids that are involved.

Well That is my blog response, its pretty long...hope I can match it up to the next one!

:)




"Menopausal mom pubescent teen = hormone hell - The Globe and Mail." Home - The Globe and Mail. 14 July 2009 [http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/family-and-relationships/menopausal-mom-pubescent-teen-hormone-hell/article1215931/].